Legal Opinion

Herbert v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1997No. 93-CV-407Published

1Opinion of the Court

691 A.2d 1175 (1997)

Katherine HERBERT, Appellant,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.

No. 93-CV-407.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued January 9, 1995.

Decided April 10, 1997.

Judy L. Feinberg, Washington, DC, with whom Andrea L. Koyner was on the brief, for appellant.

Edward E. Schwab, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Vanessa Ruiz, Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, and Michael F. Wasserman, Assistant Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.

E…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API