Legal Opinion

Deep-Sea Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. The City of Alexandria

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 25, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions to Report on Damages.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Both vessels were found in fault for the collision in the above case, (31 Fed. Rep. 427,) and both parties have filed exceptions to the report of the commissioner on damages.

1. Value of the Queen. The Queen, having been sunk, proved to be a total loss, as her value when raised was less than the cost of raising. She was a dredge of peculiar construction; and, there being no such market as to establish a market price for such a structure, the valuation reported was based upon the cost of construction. Her hull was formerly a scow, bought in 1885 for $15,180, and she was completed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. The Amiable NancySupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. The GorgasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carscallen v. Coeur D'Alene & St. Joe Transportation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. The Energia & The Wild PigeonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
  3. The LucilleDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1909
  4. Packard v. HinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  5. Shaver Transp. Co. v. Columbia Contract Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API