Legal Opinion
Packard v. Hines
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, District Judge.
In the view I take it is unnecessary to consider any other point than that of demur-*558rage, because all 'the other items were on the argument conceded to be correct except that of eighteen hundred dollars for the tug, “Enterprise,” and that is a; proper charge except that the libelant asserts it to have been duplicated in calculating the demurrage. Begarding, as I do, the demurrage charge as erroneously calculated, it becomes unnecessary to ¡¡onsider this supposed duplication, and I pass, therefore, directly to the chief point.
It is true that in the ordinary case of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The North StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- The Winfield S. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Partridge v. The Margaret J. SanfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
- The William H. BaileyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930