Legal Opinion

State v. Hawley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1981No. 8111SC368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants assign as error the court’s failure to grant their timely motions for judgment as of nonsuit and for “judgment notwithstanding the verdict.” In ruling upon a defendant’s motion to dismiss or for judgment as in the case of nonsuit, the trial court is limited solely to the function of determining whether a reasonable inference of the defendant’s guilt of the crime may be drawn from the evidence. State v. Smith, 40 N.C. App. 72, 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979). The evidence in the present case was sufficient to enable the jury to draw a reasonable inference that the defendants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. HaginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. RayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API