Legal Opinion
O'Hara's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 27, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.
These are two cases under the workmen’s compensation act. The facts show that the cases are subject to the same controlling principles of law and, although argued separately, they are decided by a single opinion.
Brandéis received injuries in the course of and arising out of his employment by the Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation. The general finding of the board was that the employee’s claim was within-its jurisdiction and not within the exclusive jurisdiction of admiralty. This general finding will be sustained if there is any evidence to support it. Pass’s Case, 232 Mass. 515. It imports a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moores's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Pound v. GauldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Butler v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Toland's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Baskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.