Legal Opinion

Southern Ready Mix v. AmSouth Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 1, 1991No. 89-1607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from an interpleader action in which two unsecured creditors challenged another creditor's assertion that it is secured by a security agreement. The specific issue is whether the trial court, in entering a summary judgment in favor of AmSouth Bank, N.A., properly held that AmSouth's security agreement was valid and enforceable against two unsecured creditors because of a so-called "dragnet" provision in the security agreement.

The undisputed facts are as follows: In connection with the construction of a section of an Alabama state highway, Milton Construction Company, Inc.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Guntersville v. BainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Underwood v. JarvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. First Maryland Leasecorp. v. M/V Golden EgretCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. State Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of BeevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Dixie Ag Supply, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. TRANSAMERICA COM. FIN. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Rocket City Federal Credit Union v. Kennemer (In Re Kennemer)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1992
  3. PEOPLES COMMUNITY BANK v. HelmsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API