Legal Opinion

Hambrick v. B. G. Swing Games Management, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1997No. S96A1776PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Chief Justice.

The appellants in this case are two persons holding permits for street vending from the City of Atlanta Police Department. The appellees are a corporation (B. G. Swing) and its chief operating officer, Steed. B. G. Swing contracted with the Atlanta Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) to implement a marketing, vending, and economic development program for the City of Atlanta’s benefit during the 1996 Summer Olympic Games. Appellants filed in Fulton Superior Court an unverified information in the nature of quo warranto challenging appellees’ authority to exercise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Evans v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Five Star Steel Construction, Inc. v. Klockner Namasco Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Hooks v. Cobb Center Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Howard v. Technosystems Consolidated Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Moore v. Pitt-Desmoines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API