Legal Opinion
Bridgeport State Bank v. Union Warehouse & Milling Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1926No. 19309. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
This action was instituted to recover upon a guaranty signed by defendants. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in their favor. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial were denied, and plaintiffs appeal.
Appellants sued on a guaranty given to the Bridgeport State Bank to guarantee liabilities of the Union Warehouse & Milling Company to the extent of $25,000. The important part of the guaranty, so far as this appeal is concerned, is contained in the following words:
“. . . and that this shall he a continuing guarantee, and shall cover all the liabilities (according to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Crab Creek and Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Lydon v. Exchange National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryant v. Food MacH. & Chem. Corp. Niagara Chem. Div.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Weil v. Free State Oil Co. of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Alton Banking & Trust Co. v. SchweitzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- First American National Bank of Nashville v. HallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Dickinson v. Meyer Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988