Legal Opinion

Haney v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1978No. 27671PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

The principal question raised by this appeal is whether the Public Utilities Commission (the commission) has authority to impose a monetary fine as an alternative to revoking a contract carrier’s permit or certificate of public convenience and necessity. We hold that the commission has no such authority.

After an administrative investigation and hearing, the commission issued a decision 1 finding that the appellees had violated both the Public Utilities Law 2 and the commission’s rules and regulations. The violations consisted of serving customers and areas not within the scope of authority…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller Bros., Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. City of Delta v. ThompsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. Colorado Motorway, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Rumney v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peoples Natural Gas Division of Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Caldwell v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Colorado Department of Social Services v. Smith, Harst & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Smith, Harst & Associates, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API