Legal Opinion

People v. Hurwich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1932No. Docket No. 194, Calendar No. 35,570PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I do not agree with Mr. Justice WIEST that the record presents reversible error.

I agree that the question asked of witness Miller, quoted by Mr. Justice WIEST, should not have been propounded. Miller's testimony was not so important as to justify the people in hazarding possible arousal of racial prejudice and consequent reversible error. But the question was competent as a prior inconsistent statement of the witness, as is made apparent by its setting.

An important issue was whether a fire would have profited defendants. There was considerable evidence that the business was a losing venture,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Houghton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. FurkasMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BarrowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. PankninMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. People v. BurnsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. StanleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Crawford v. LydickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API