Legal Opinion

Arnold G. Dorsey, A.K.A. Engelbert Humperdinck v. National Enquirer, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1992No. 90-55017, 90-55344Published

1Opinion of the Court

973 F.2d 1431

20 Media L. Rep. 1745

Arnold G. DORSEY, a.k.a. Engelbert Humperdinck, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 90-55017, 90-55344.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1991.

Opinion Filed Dec. 11, 1991.

Opinion Withdrawn Aug. 17, 1992.

Decided Aug. 17, 1992.

Robert H. Rotstein, Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard S. Hoffman, Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before:…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Florida Star v. B. J. F.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Walter Jacobson and Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Good Government Group of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API