Legal Opinion

United States v. Rose

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 18, 2015No. 13-1525PPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Russell Rose and Kelvin Frye appeal convictions stemming from their respective roles in a Cape Cod based drug-distribution conspiracy. Their claims challenge several aspects of the proceedings below. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

We begin with a brief overview of the case, saving a detailed recitation of the facts for the applicable analytical section below. We present the facts in an objective manner. See United States v. Burgos-Montes, 786 F.3d 92, 99 (1st Cir.2015).

The government charged Rose, Frye, and fourteen others with conspiring to distribute, and to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. BainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. DavilaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Perez-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Meléndez-GonzálezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API