Legal Opinion

Nieto v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1982No. Civ. 65677PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Irene Nieto appeals from an order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendant City of Los Angeles to her complaint asserting causes of action for quasi-intentional interference with contractual relations, negligence and breach of warranty. Defendant based its demurrer on the ground that the complaint in reality stated a cause of action for wrongful death and plaintiff lacked standing, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 377, to bring such an action.

Statement of Facts

On demurrer, all…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Santa Barbara v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Owen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Taylor v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API