Legal Opinion

Coflexip & Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 2, 1991No. 33-88CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This matter is again before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the United States Claims Court (RUSCC) following partial denial of their prior cross-motions for summary judgment in Coflexip & Servs., Inc. v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 412 (1990) (Coflexip I). For the reasons stated below, the court now grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and denies plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment for costs incurred in developing a prototype of its offered design.

FACTS

Plaintiff Coflexip & Services, Inc.,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coflexip & Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API