Legal Opinion

Lange v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 15, 1926No. C-931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

In this case the plaintiffs sue to recover certain items of cost alleged to have been occasioned by the temporary suspension of the work contracted to be done, the suspension being caused by the Government’s action. There were two contracts involving buildings at San Diego, Calif., the work complete under them calling for expenditures in excess of a half million dollars. The contracts were performed and the entire consideration provided in them has been paid. The amount now claimed is approximately $3,600. The alleged suspensions were caused by some changes made in the plans. For the periods…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API