Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Overton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1899PublishedCited by 27 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilees, J.

This is an action for damages for the drowning of Oscar Cooper, the son of plaintiff, Wm. H. Cooper, the father ' being the administrator of the son. It is conceded that there is no cause of action against Jno. Overton, trustee, and as to him the action is dismissed. There was a verdict and judgment for defendant, and an appeal by plaintiff, as administrator, and he has assigned errors.

The facts, so far as necessary to be stated, az*e that Oscar Cooper, a boy about ten years of age, was drowned by falling from a plank upon which he was attempting to float upon a pond of water upon a lot owned…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hargreaves v. DeaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Bransom's adm'r v. LabrotCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Polk v. Laurel Hill Cemetery Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API