Legal Opinion
Caverno v. Houghton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 30, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff in this action of tort seeks to recover compensation for personal injuries received by her while riding as guest in an áutomobile owned and operated by the defendant. There are two counts in the declaration, one alleging gross negligence of the defendant, and the other alleging illegal registration of the automobile of the defendant. There was evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff tending to show these facts: The parties were teachers in the public schools in Gloucester and were friendly with each other. On a November afternoon in 1932 the plaintiff accepted the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Burke v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Meeney v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Tuells v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- MacInnis v. MorrisseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Munson v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Russell v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- McKnight v. Red Cab Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.