Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. Stuart

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1996No. Criminal No. 950383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

546 N.W.2d 366 (1996)

CITY OF BISMARCK, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Ronald E. STUART, Defendant and Appellant.

Criminal No. 950383.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

April 23, 1996.

Paul H. Fraase (argued), City Prosecutor, Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee.

Ronald E. Stuart (argued), Valley City, pro se for defendant and appellant.

2Per curiam

Ronald Stuart appeals from his conviction for driving while under suspension. Stuart argues that he has a constitutional right to operate an automobile on public roads without a driver's license. No court has ever held that it is an impermissible infringement upon a…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SkurdalMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. KoubaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. StuartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Boutin v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. City of Salina v. WisdenUtah Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. HershbergerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  3. Emter v. EmterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. State v. RohdeNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API