Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. Chidester

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 27, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00309Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION RUSSELL GRANT FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-309-JD-JEM DAVID CHIDESTER, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Russell Grant Finnegan, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Edward Tobey v. Brenda ChibucosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API