Legal Opinion

Cole Banking Co. v. Sinclair

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1908No. 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by tbe Oole Banking Company against C. G. Sinclair and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, one of defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStbatjp, J.

This action was brought to recover money alleged to be due on a promissory note. It was alleged in the complaint that the defendant Hensel executed and delivered the note to the defendant Sinclair; that, before maturity, Sinclair indorsed and delivered the note to plaintiff, guaranteeing the payment, thereof; and that payment was demanded of the defendants which they failed and refused to make. The defendant Hen-sel answered admitting the execution and delivery of the note, and further alleged that he executed it in payment of premiums on a life insurance policy delivered to him by Sinclair…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. DillonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Wheat v. GossIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Karren v. BairUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Taylor & Co. v. Nehi Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Christensen v. Financial Service Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API