Legal Opinion

Andrew Crispo Gallery v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 24, 1992No. Docket No. 20343-88UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW CRISPO GALLERY, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Andrew Crispo Gallery v. Commissioner

Docket No. 20343-88.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-106; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 127; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 2152; T.C.M. (RIA) 92106;

February 24, 1992, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Walter J. Rockier, Mary E. Cassidy, and David P. Gersch, for petitioner.

Diane D. Helfgott, for respondent.

COHEN

COHEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

COHEN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $ 2,559,639.13 in petitioner's Federal income tax for 1987 and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Michael L. Rockwell, and Regina Rockwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Howard S. Scar and Ethel M. Scar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrew Crispo Gallery, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Andrew Crispo Gallery, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API