Legal Opinion

Piskanin v. Doe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 2009No. 09-2836PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Michael J. Piskanin, Jr., a Pennsylvania state inmate, commenced this pro se action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by filing a pleading titled “Complaint Seeking to Compel Federal Officers to Perform Duty to Protect.” Piskanin claimed that he is a “former operative” for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and that he is entitled to FBI “protection” from numerous public officials who allegedly have engaged in retaliatory acts, including the criminal prosecution of Piska-nin. Piskanin asked that the District Court direct the named defendants…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ayatollah Syed M. J. Iqbal Jafree v. John R. Barber, Acting Special Agent, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglass CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. InchDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  2. ELANSARI v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API