Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley Methodist Episcopal Church

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1927No. 25,716PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

That our duty is to construe the compensation act liberally has nothing to say to the case, for the necessity remains to find a ponderable basis for it in the evidence before sustaining a finding for the affirmative of the issue. No such basis has been discovered by my search of record and briefs. And it appears to me plainly that, if there is any such evidence, it is not only outweighed but completely obliterated by contrary proof.

The conflict, if any, is between the inferences and not in the evidence itself. The proof is that Orcutt was mopping the basement floor when he was interrupted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Young v. BjornesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Orcutt v. Trustees of Wesley Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API