Legal Opinion
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy
District Court, D. Utah
Decided March 10, 2017No. Case No.: 1:11-cv-00167-BSJPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER REGARDING POLAR ELECTRO OY AND POLAR ELECTRO INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Bruce S. Jenkins, United States Senior District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendants’, Polar Electro Oy and Polar Electro Inc. (collectively, “Polar”), Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). (Dkt. No. 147) (“Motion”). Polar contends that certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,701,271 (“ ’271 patent”) are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter and are, therefore, invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (“Section 101”). For the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cranford v. Farmers New World Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Prismview v. Old Dominion Freight LineDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022