Legal Opinion

State v. Nixon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 6, 1966No. 1 CA-CR 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

This opinion relates to the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals to entertain a certified question.

It is appropriate for a court to inquire into its jurisdiction. There are two general areas of inquiry in relation to this case. The first, as in Searles v. Haldiman, 3 Ariz.App. 294, 413 P.2d 860 (1966), relates to whether the action of the trial court is appealable to this Court or the Supreme Court. The second, as in State v. Mileham, 1 Ariz.App. 67, 399 P.2d 688 (1965), relates to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain a matter which is in itself an appealable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MilehamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. J. H. Welsh & Son Contracting Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Searles v. HaldimanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Industrial Commission v. Harbor InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth PrecinctCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. State v. NixonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Industrial Commission v. Harbor InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API