Legal Opinion

Wolfram v. State Ex Rel. Burnquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1956No. 36,674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order of the district court granting a motion for summary judgment for the State of Minnesota by its attorney general and the commissioner of highways.

The case arises out of a petition for a writ of mandamus describing certain property owned by petitioners, Millard T. Wolfram and Marion L. Wolfram, with the purpose of directing respondent state to institute a condemnation proceeding against the property.

The main allegation of the petition and writ is to the effect that the taking of property adjacent to the Wolfram…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Sallden v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Dickerman v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Northern States Power Company v. MINNESOTA METROPOLITAN COUNCILSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API