State v. Keen

VAUGHN, Judge.

In support of his contention that the court should have granted his motion for judgment of nonsuit, defendant argues that the State’s own evidence shows that:

“ . . . the defendant was (1) entrapped and (2) that there was the interposition of a resisting will thereby making the commission of a crime impossible.”

We hold that defendant’s contentions on entrapment were properly submitted to the jury with instructions from the court which were correct in law and manifestly fair to defendant.

Defendant argues that there could have been no completion of the crime since all parties with…