Legal Opinion

Muenzer v. W. F. & John Barnes Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 23, 1956No. Gen. 10,876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crow

Ferdinand F. Muenzer, the plaintiff, brought this suit against the defendants W. F. & John Barnes Co., a corporation, hereinafter called “Barnes Co.”; Lindsay Light and Chemical Company, a corporation, hereinafter called “Lindsay Co.”; S. Becker Treat (an employee at one time of the Barnes Co.), hereinafter called “Treat”; William W. Barton (President of the Barnes Co.), hereinafter called “Barton”; and Barton Chemical Company, a corporation, hereinafter called “Barton Co.”

The complaint, as amended, contained six counts. The plaintiff alleged that he had been engaged by Barnes Co. to develop…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Long v. Arthur Rubloff & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API