Legal Opinion

Epley v. Hunter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1929No. 22050. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover upon four causes of action growing out of the alleged wrongful or excessive levy of certain writs of attachment. There is no claim that the attachment writs were wrongfully issued, but all of the causes of action are based upon the things done or permitted to be done by the sheriff while acting under authority of the writs.

Trial was had to a jury, and, at the close of plaintiff’s case, a nonsuit was granted as to the defendants who were sureties on the attachment bonds.

After all of the evidence was introduced, the cause was submitted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Oatey Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoff v. LesterWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Eckley v. Bonded Adjustment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Capper v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Marshall v. Estate of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Epley v. HunterWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API