Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. Clarke
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Councill, J., at November Term, 1909, of Caldwell. Tbis is a proceeding under tbe entry laws. Tbis issue was submitted: 1. Is tbe land described on tbe map as tbe Clarke & Kirby entry, vacant and subject to entry? Answer: Yes. ■ Tbe court rendered judgment for Clarke & Kirby, tbe entrants, from wbicb tbe protestant, tbe Wilson Lumber Company, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Tbe record discloses tbat Clarke & Kirby on 25 April, 1908, made entry in due form of certain alleged vacant lands described in tbe boundaries set out in tbe entry. On 23 May, 1908, tbe Wilson Lumber Company filed witb tbe entry taker a protest, protesting tbe entry “for tbe reason tbat tbe above boundary of land is not subject to entry, having heretofore been granted to William Puett by tbe State, and by mesne conveyances conveyed to tbe protestant, tbe Wilson Lumber and Milling Company, and tbe said above-described land is now owned by tbe said Wilson Lumber and Milling Company.”
On tbe…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walker v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walker v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Lumber Co. v. . HuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912