Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Long, J., at May Term, 1911, of Caldwell. Civil action, trespass to realty. There was verdict for defendant. Judgment on tbe verdict, and plaintiff excepted and appealed. The facts are sufficiently stated in the per curiam opinion.
1Per curiam
On a former appeal in this cause, reported in 152 N. C., 544, the facts will sufficiently appear to indicate the purport of the present decision. It was chiefly urged for error in the present trial that the court below had made unwarranted departure from the rulings made in the former opinion, by which the cause should be tried, and more especially in submitting the case on the position that if the “Daniel Moore” line and the “Jesse Gragg’s line” and the line of^John Crisp’s own land, called for in defendant’s grant and made two of the termini of the lines therein and the boundary of a third,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whitaker v. Cover.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Den. on Dem. of Corn v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1856
- Doe on the Demise of Campbell v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
- Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Little v. SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Kissam v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852