Legal Opinion

Grotsch v. Hassey

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

This action is brought for an adjudication that the defendant be barred from any claim of dower, or other estate, in certain real property. The defendant counterclaims, seeking an adjudication that she is entitled to dower, and asking that it be admeasured, etc. The question is whether the defendant was the wife of Michael Ilg at the time of his death.

Admittedly, the parties had been married, and prior to the death of Michael Ilg the defendant had brought an action against him to obtain an annulment of her marriage on the ground that it was procured by fraud. In that action she had obtained…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Administration of the Estate of CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. In Re Estate of SeilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McCurley v. McCurleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Chase v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Henderson v. RessorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foy v. Estate of SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dibble v. MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In re the Estate of AdamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  4. In re the Estate of HaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. In re the Estate of HuberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API