Laguna Hermosa Corporation v. B. E. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This case reaches us on an appeal by the United States, representing B. E. Martin, the Regional Director of the Bureau of Reclamation. The district court entered a declaratory judgment extending the Concession Agreement of Laguna Hermosa Corporation (“Laguna”) with Napa County (“the County”), the United States’ predecessor in interest. The United States claims that the district court lacked jurisdiction, and that the United States could not be estopped on the facts of this case. We affirm.
FACTS
Laguna is a concessionaire providing public use facilities at Lake…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Megapulse, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Hahn, Michael S. And Bradley, B. Shay and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.