Legal Opinion

Brighthouse Life Insurance Company v. Lawrence Rudolph

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 25, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00870Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brighthouse Life Insurance Company, No. CV-24-00870-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Lawrence Rudolph, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court is Brighthouse Life Insurance Company’s (“Brighthouse”) Motion 16 for Attorney Fees. (Doc. 26). The Court previously entered default judgment in favor of 17 Brighthouse and allowed the filing of the present Motion. (Doc. 21 at 10–11). The Motion 18 is unopposed and the time to file a Response has passed. See LRCiv. 7.2(c). Brighthouse 19 seeks $71,419.50 in attorneys’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Flores-De-JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API