Legal Opinion
Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2002No. 2000-1556PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 380.] VACCARIELLO, N.K.A. RESHA, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SMITH & NEPHEW RICHARDS, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.,
2002-Ohio-892.] Civil procedure—Filing of a class action tolls the statute of limitations as to all members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action—Torts—Defective products—Pedicle screw/Rogozinski System. (No. 00-1556—Submitted September 18, 2001—Decided March 6, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Unifund CCR Partners v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ehlert v. Western Reserve Port Auth., Unpublished Decision (9-30-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Grubbs v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020