Legal Opinion
M3 USA Corporation v. Haunert
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 11, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-3784Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M3 USA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. No. 20-cv-3784 (DLF) SAVANAH HAUNERT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Dkt. 7. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND The plaintiff, M3 USA Corporation (M3), filed its complaint in D.C. Superior Court alleging one count of breach of contract against Savanah Haunert, a former employee who left M3 to work for a competitor in alleged violation of a non-compete covenant. See generally Compl., Dkt. 1-4. M3 alleges that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.