Legal Opinion

Haas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 10, 1999No. 97-575TPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This tax case is presently before the court on plaintiffs application for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to I.R.C. § 7430 (West Supp.1998). In the underlying action, plaintiff sought a refund of taxes paid as a result of certain disallowed partnership losses in Transpac Drilling Venture 1983-9 (Transpac). On May 4, 1998, defendant conceded liability and subsequently tendered to plaintiff a check for the full amount sought, plus interest. Because the objective of plaintiffs suit had been achieved, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bromley v. McCaughnSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Jeffrey G. Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Larsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Pohl Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Binks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API