Legal Opinion

Binks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 16, 1998No. 96-497TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This tax refund action is currently before the court on plaintiffs motion for payment of reasonable fees incurred in preparation of the complaint. Plaintiff contends that he is a prevailing party and therefore entitled, under 26 U.S.C. § 7430, to the reasonable fees and costs incurred in bringing this suit. Defendant claims that plaintiff is not entitled to recovery of such fees and costs because plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and is not a prevailing party as defined by section 7430. After carefully considering both parties’ written submissions,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Larsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. In Re RobidouxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
  4. Kenlin Industries, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Pohl Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Whalen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API