Follett v. Voris
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KENNERLY, Chief Judge.
This suit in Admiralty arises under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, Section 901 et seq., Title 33 U.S.C.A. Libellant, suing under Section 921, complains that the Deputy Commissioner, upon the undisputed facts before him, should have allowed libellant compensation in the sum of $2,183.60, when in fact he only allowed $1,113.
It is undisputed that libellant was injured, duly presented his claim, and is entitled to compensation under such Act. That his average weekly wages were $103 per week. That, as a result of such injury, libellant suffered…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Texas Employers' Insurance v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.