Legal Opinion
Verino v. Hickey
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1925No. 19121. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
— This is an appeal by the defendants, Hickey and wife, from an order of the superior court for Pierce county decreeing that certain personal property owned by them as their community property is subject to execution and sale towards the satisfaction of a judgment rendered by that court in favor of the plaintiff, Verino, and against them as a community; they claiming the property to be exempt from such execution and sale.
In September, 1924, there was duly rendered by default, in the superior court for Pierce county, a judg- meiit in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Sampson v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Tuttle v. StroutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- O'Leary v. CroghanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Adams v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Spokane v. CoonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Tellevik v. REAL PROPERTY IN PIERCE CTY.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 6717 100th Street S.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.