Legal Opinion

Eckelman v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the Hyde Park Fire and Water District is exempt from the provisions of Local Finance Law § 102.00, the intervenor appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered July 1, 1991, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiffs-respondents.

The intervenor, who was granted leave to intervene by prior order of this court, contends that the Supreme Court erred in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Van Wagner v. Hyde Park Fire & Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schulz v. New York State LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API