Wormser v. Shayne
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill for injunction to restrain use of trade-name. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the court.
We are of opinion that the complainant, appellant here, is entitled to relief on the facts stated in his bill, in other words, that the bill is sufficient; and the only question here is, whether the complainant has been guilty of such inequitable conduct in relation to the subject-matter of the bill as precludes him from relief in equity. This is admitted by counsel for the defendant, in their printed argument, they saying:
' “ The question before the court, under the assignment of errors, is whether the affirmative defense of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Connell v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Meriden Britannia Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- Solis Cigar Co. v. Pozo & SuarezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ansehl v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Regent Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. HaakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906