Meriden Britannia Co. v. Parker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill in equity for an injunction against the use of a trade mark; brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County. Facts reported by a committee and case reserved for advice. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.* cited Or oft v. Bay, 7 Beav., 84; Pdelston y. Vide, 23 Eng. Law & Eq. R., 51, 56, 57; Badgers v. Nowill, 5 Mann. Grang. & Scott, 109; Ourtis v. Bryan, 2 Daly, 312; Walton v. Qrowley, 3 Blatchf., 440 ; Bale v. Smithson, 12 Abb.
Read the full summary
Bill in equity for an injunction against the use of a trade mark; brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County. Facts reported by a committee and case reserved for advice. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.* cited Or oft v. Bay, 7 Beav., 84; Pdelston y. Vide, 23 Eng. Law & Eq. R., 51, 56, 57; Badgers v. Nowill, 5 Mann. Grang. & Scott, 109; Ourtis v. Bryan, 2 Daly, 312; Walton v. Qrowley, 3 Blatchf., 440 ; Bale v. Smithson, 12 Abb. Pr. R., 237; Bixon v. Ouggenheim, 3 Am. Law Times, 288 ; Holmes, Booth $ Haydens v. Holmes, Booth §■ Atwood Manuf. Oo.,…
1Opinion of the CourtCaepentbR, J.
The report of the committee contains an *453elaborate statement of facts, many of which are immaterial in themselves, but important only as being evidential of other facts which are material; there is also a reference to a large mass of documentary evidence used_on the trial, all of which is simply evidence tending to prove the material facts in controversy. In this connection we may add that many of the questions discussed in the able and exhaustive arguments to which we listened, are questions of fact. Of course it is not our province to' decide such questions, and we shall not attempt to do…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boardman v. Meriden Britannia Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
3Cited by27 opinions
- Meneely v. . MeneelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Gilman v. HunnewellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Nelson v. J. H. Winchell & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Vidal v. ElsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. T. M. Bissell Plow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1902
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.