Legal Opinion

Keystone Foods Corp. v. Meeks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 21, 1995No. 1931521PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Based on a jury verdict, the trial court entered a judgment for the plaintiff, Tiffany Meeks, in her action alleging that she had been dismissed from her employment for filing a workers' compensation claim. The defendant, Keystone Foods, Inc., appeals from the denial of its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, as we are required to do, we find that the evidence tended to show the following:

The plaintiff, Tiffany Meeks, began working for Keystone in March 1990. Keystone is in the business of processing chicken.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Irons v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kent Corp. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Woodard v. Town of OakmanDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
  3. G. UB. MK. Constructors v. CarsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte BreitsprecherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Hammock v. Ryder Dedicated Logistics, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API