Cogdall v. Cottrell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Oullison, Judge. Action by B. E. Cottrell against W. E. Cogdall and others to recover a share in certain partnership assets. Judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
The defendant in error, B. F. Cottrell, commenced this action in the district court of Garfield county against the plaintiffs in error, W. E. Cogdall, F. H. Bowers, and W. M. Shockley, to recover $612.50 alleged to be due as his pro rata share of the sale of certain oil and gas leases which had been sold for the sum of $2,850. The parties herein will be referred to as they appeared in the trial of the cause.
From the pleadings filed and the evidence introduced in the trial of the cause, B. F. Cottrell, F. PI. Bowers, W. M. Shockley and Charles Carr in March, 1916, entered into an oral…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Chowning v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. StringhamUtah Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brittain v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925