Legal Opinion

Weisberg v. Brogan

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 31, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoneparth, J.

Motion by the third-party defendant, Salter Fuel Oil Corp. (hereinafter referred to as Salter), to dismiss the complaint of the third-party plaintiff, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Third-party plaintiff, Brogan, is the defendant, in an action brought by a tenant in Brogan’s building. The original complaint alleges, that the defendant was negligent in maintaining an oil burner; that the oil burner exploded by reason of defendant’s failure to inspect the same and ascertain the defects therein.

Brogan’s third-party complaint alleges the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Schick v. FleischhauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Village of Buchanan, New York County Courts1959
  2. Anderson v. Radio Corp. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API