Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Radio Corp. of America
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
Motion to dismiss the complaint as to the defendant Dun Well Service, Inc., on the ground that the facts stated in the cause of action against it are insufficient to constitute a cause of action granted.
For the purposes of this motion, the following facts are accepted as true: The plaintiff in November, 1954 purchased a gas range manufactured by R. C. A. On May 10, 1960 she was injured when the range exploded. Prior to the explosion numerous requests were made upon Dun Well Service, Inc., “ to perform repairs, maintenance and service ” upon the range as it had agreed to do under a contract…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Denny v. Manhattan Co.New York Supreme Court · 1846
- Kushes v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. ArchibaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Sound of Market Street, Inc. v. Continental Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Anderson v. Radio Corp. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- World Trade Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Lido Knitting Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990