Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Adelaide Shipping Lines, Ltd., Claimant-Appellee, and Salen Reefer Services Ab, and M/v Gladiola
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal in admiralty from a judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint in rem and in personam against appellees for cargo damage aboard the vessel GLADIOLA.
FACTS
The facts are not seriously in dispute. Appellant [Sunkist] is a California corporation engaged in packing and shipping citrus fruit. Claimant [Adelaide] is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Great Britain and is the owner of the vessel GLADIOLA, a general cargo vessel of 11,-890 tons carrying capacity. Salen is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the country of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Z.K. Marine, Inc. v. M/V ArchigetisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Eac Timberlane, Etc. v. Pisces, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- North River Insurance Co. v. Fed Sea/Fed Pac LineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Damodar Bulk Carriers, Ltd. v. Damodar TanabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. M/s "St. Constantine," v. A/s Garonne-Glittre, in Intervention-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.