Legal Opinion

Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. M/s "St. Constantine," v. A/s Garonne-Glittre, in Intervention-Appellees-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1983No. 81-4660, 81-4644 and 82-4006PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Hasbro Industries, Inc., and A.A. Importing, Inc., were owners or underwriters of cargo destroyed when a fire broke out aboard the M/S St. Constantine, a cargo ship owned by the St. Constantine Maritime Co., Ltd. Appellants filed claims in a limitation proceeding brought by the vessel under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 190-195 (1976). The claims were based upon the carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), 46 U.S.C. §§ 1300-1315 (1976). The district court found that the fire started when a lube oil line valve fractured due to excessive engine vibration and the absence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Adelaide Shipping Lines, Ltd., Claimant-Appellee, and Salen Reefer Services Ab, and M/v GladiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Rederi A/B Soya v. SS Grand GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Leslie v. Grupo ICACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API