Legal Opinion

State v. Rhodius

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. G. H. Noonan.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

It is too late in the discussions of this court to contend that the securities upon a recognizance, who under*166take that their principal shall appear before the court to answer a criminal charge, may come into court and question the sufficiency of an indictment, without producing the body of their principal. This is an elementary principle of the criminal law.

The court erred in dismissing the appellee, and quashing the recognizance. If the appellee claimed that he was sued by a wrong name, it was in the nature of a plea in abatement, which should have been sworn to, and the writ might have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smalley v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AkeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. United States v. DavenportDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1920
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886
  5. Smalley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API